Elucidation of Kinetic Studies in Biosurfactant Fermentative Production and Their Behaviour: A Mini Review

Authors

  • Nur Raudhah Azman Chemical Reaction Engineering Group (CREG), Faculty of Chemical Energy and Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia; Innovation Centre in Agritechnology for Advanced Bioprocessing (ICA), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Pagoh, Malaysia
  • Umi Aisah Asli Chemical Reaction Engineering Group (CREG), Faculty of Chemical & Energy Engineering, UTM
  • Amnani Shamjuddina Chemical Reaction Engineering Group (CREG), Faculty of Chemical Energy and Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/bioprocessing.v2n2.38

Keywords:

Biosurfactant, Kinetic Behaviour, Kinetic profile, Biomass, Substrate consumption

Abstract

Bioprocess engineering, which include kinetic behaviour, is a fundamental form of developing effective product performance and functionality. Kinetic studies are one of the most important steps in any bioprocess and bioproduct development to elucidate the production phase and product behaviour. The lack of comprehensive understanding and limited knowledge of the kinetic behaviour of biosurfactant production, especially in the complex fermentation process involving microorganisms, substrate, and product formation, is major challenge and hinder the development of optimized biosurfactant in the industrial scale. Kinetic studies in the field of biosurfactants need to be emphasized to better understand the mechanisms of biosurfactant formation through biomass growth and substrate consumption. In this mini-review, various kinetic models used in biosurfactant work were critically discussed. The objective of this study is to analyze the kinetic studies of biomass growth, biosurfactant formation and substrate consumption focusing on the biosurfactant itself. This review revealed the various kinetic models used in fermentative biosurfactant production and how the different models were used and interpreted based on different substrates and biosurfactant-producing microorganisms. A key feature of this review is its focus on the biosurfactant, which provides valuable insights into the factors that maximize productivity and improve scale-up. Based on previous works, the logistic model is preferred to represent biomass growth, biosurfactant formation and substrate consumption due to its simplicity and rationale. Throughout this study, the kinetic profile of the biosurfactant able to be established and serve as a foundation for the prediction of the biosurfactant behaviour.

References

Alvarado, K., Niño, L., & Gelves, G. (2022). Kinetic modeling of biosurfactant production from crude oil using Bacillus subtilis cells. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 41(June), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2022.06.009

Amodu, O. S., Ojumu, T. V., & Ntwampe, S. K. O. (2016). Kinetic modelling of cell growth, substrate utilization, and biosurfactant production from solid agrowaste (Beta vulgaris) by Bacillus licheniformis STK 01. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 94(12), 2268–2275. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22631

Babu, P. S., Vaidya, A. ., Bal, A. ., Kapur, R., Juwakkar, A., & Khanna, P. (1996). Kinetics of Biosurfactant Production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain BS2 From Industrial Wastes. Biotechnology Letters, 18(3), 263–268.

Bacaër, N. (2011). A short history of mathematical population dynamics. A Short History of Mathematical Population Dynamics, 1838, 1–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-115-8

Bertrand, B., Martínez-Morales, F., Rosas-Galván, N., Morales-Guzmán, D., & Trejo-Hernández, M. (2018). Statistical Design, a Powerful Tool for Optimizing Biosurfactant Production: A Review. Colloids and Interfaces, 2(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids2030036

Câmara, J. M. D. A., Sousa, M. A. S. B., & Barros Neto, E. L. (2020). Modeling of Rhamnolipid Biosurfactant Production: Estimation of Kinetic Parameters by Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Surfactants and Detergents, 23(4), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsde.12410

Heryani, H., & Putra, M. D. (2017). Kinetic study and modeling of biosurfactant production using Bacillus sp. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 27, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.03.005

Husain, A. (1998). Mathematical models of the kinetics of anaerobic digestion - A selected review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 14(5–6), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10047-2

Ibrahim, S., Khalil, K. A., Nabilah, K., Zahri, M., Gomez-fuentes, C., Convey, P., Zulkharnain, A., Sabri, S., Alias, S. A., Gonz, G., & Ahmad, S. A. (2020). Biosurfactant Production and Growth Kinetics Studies of the Waste Canola Oil-Degrading Bacterium. Molecules, 25(17), 1–15.

Karlapudi, A. P., Venkateswarulu, T. C., Tammineedi, J., Kanumuri, L., Ravuru, B. K., Dirisala, V. ramu, & Kodali, V. P. (2018). Role of biosurfactants in bioremediation of oil pollution-a review. Petroleum, 4(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2018.03.007

Ketsub, N., Latif, A., Kent, G., Doherty, W. O. S., O’Hara, I. M., Zhang, Z., & Kaparaju, P. (2021). A systematic evaluation of biomethane production from sugarcane trash pretreated by different methods. Bioresource Technology, 319(September 2020), 124137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124137

Kong, L., Saar, K. L., Jacquat, R., Hong, L., Levin, A., Gang, H., Ye, R., Mu, B., & Knowles, T. P. J. (2017). Mechanism of biosurfactant adsorption to oil/water interfaces from millisecond scale tensiometry measurements. Interface Focus, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0013

Mercier, P., Yerushalmi, L., Rouleau, D., & Dochain, D. (1992). Kinetics of Lactic Acid Fermentation on Glucose and Corn by Lactobacillus amylophilus. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 55, 111–121.

Montoya Vallejo, C., Flórez Restrepo, M. A., Guzmán Duque, F. L., & Quintero Díaz, J. C. (2021). Production, characterization and kinetic model of biosurfactant produced by lactic acid bacteria. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 53, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2021.06.001

Muloiwa, M., Nyende-byakika, S., & Dinka, M. (2020). Comparison of unstructured kinetic bacterial growth models . ☆. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 33(May 2019), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2020.07.006

Phulpoto, I. A., Yu, Z., Qazi, M. A., Ndayisenga, F., & Yang, J. (2023). A comprehensive study on microbial-surfactants from bioproduction scale-up toward electrokinetics remediation of environmental pollutants: Challenges and perspectives. Chemosphere, 311(P1), 136979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136979

Priyadarshini, A., Sahoo, M. M., Raut, P. R., Mahanty, B., & Sahoo, N. K. (2021). Kinetic modelling and process engineering of phenolics microbial and enzymatic biodegradation: A current outlook and challenges. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 44(October), 102421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102421

Ray, M., Kumar, V., Banerjee, C., Gupta, P., Singh, S., & Singh, A. (2021). Investigation of biosurfactants produced by three indigenous bacterial strains, their growth kinetics and their anthracene and fluorene tolerance. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208, 111621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111621

Rodrigues, L., Moldes, A., Teixeira, J., & Oliveira, R. (2006). Kinetic study of fermentative biosurfactant production by Lactobacillus strains. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 28(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2005.06.001

Sakthipriya, N., Doble, M., & Sangwai, J. S. (2015). Biosurfactant from Pseudomonas species with waxes as carbon source - Their production, modeling and properties. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 31, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.06.013

Santos, D. K. ., Rufino, R. D., Luna, J. M., Santos, V. A., & Sarubbo, L. A. (2016). Biosurfactants: Multifunctional biomolecules of the 21st century. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17030401

Viggor, S., Heinaru, E., Truu, J., & Heinaru, A. (2019). Kinetics of phenol degradation by selected bacterial strains with different genetic properties. Linnaeus Eco-Tech, 315–324. https://doi.org/10.15626/eco-tech.2005.032

Wachenheim, D. E., Patterson, J. A., & Ladisch, M. R. (2003). Analysis of the logistic function model: Derivation and applications specific to batch cultured microorganisms. Bioresource Technology, 86(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00149-9

Zhu, Z., Sun, L., Huang, X., Ran, W., & Shen, Q. (2014). Comparison of the kinetics of lipopeptide production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens XZ-173 in solid-state fermentation under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(5), 1615–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1587-7

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29